AMX-30 Char de Bataille 1966–2006, vol. II

AMX-30 Char de Bataille 1966–2006, vol. II

The AMX-30 Crew. The AMX-30B’s crew consisted of four men, and it followed a conventional layout with the driver at the front left, the fighting compartment in the center of the tank and the engine and transmission at the rear of the vehicle.

Most of the men in the Arme Blindée Cavalerie (or ABC as it was usually abbreviated to) were appelés; or conscripts. In the early days, armoured regiments differed in how they approached how to deploy their professional and conscript soldiers with the new tank.
 Some regiments only employed professional soldiers as tank commanders and NCOs in their armoured squadrons and employed conscript gunners and loaders. Conscripts selected for promotion in these cases could more often be found in the escadron porté or the escadron de commandement. Conscript junior officers and non-commissioned officers eventually became more common in the armoured squadrons as time passed. In the early days of the AMX-30’s service some regiments only used regular soldiers (engagés) for crew commanders and as drivers. The first escadron to get the new tanks in a regiment was a matter of the regimental commander’s choice. The 5e Regiment de Cuirassiers received sufficient AMX-30B in the spring of 1969 to re-equip an escadron previously serving on AMX-13 SS11 light tanks. By the latter years of the AMX-30B’s service in some regiments only the senior non-commissioned officers and officers in an armoured regiment were professional soldiers. This came about as a result of the creation of a specialised conscript category in 1975 to provide a regular supply of specialised personnel in key roles. The new category was entitled engagé volontaire spécialiste, with driver or gunner specialization. The new category was embraced to varying degrees within the regiments of the ABC.

The AMX-32, designed by GIAT from 1975 as a possible successor to the AMX-30B. Two prototypes were built, in 1979 and 1981. The French Army never bought the AMX-32, and had already ordered the improvement program that came to be known as the AMX-30B2 by 1980. The AMX-32 was an all-welded vehicle armoured with a steel armour system employing plates of differing hardness, a COTAC fire control system and the DIVT-13 low light camera. Here we can see the 1981 prototype, which featured a more angular mantlet. [Thomas Seignon]

All crew received two months of basic training known as Formation Élementaire Toutes Armes (FETTA), after which drivers were sent to the (CIABC = Centre d’Instruction de l’Arme Blindée Cavalerie), near Marseille at Carpiagne for specialisation training. Gunners received their gunnery courses at the Corps de Troupes level (with their regiments), or at Carpiagne with further training conducted within their regiments. The loader-operator (radio-chargeur or Romeo Charlie in French) followed a similar path, with much of the training being conducted in the regimental training cadre or escadron d’instruction, which was tasked with streaming suitably trained young conscripts into the escadrons for inclusion into the tank crews. Each peloton was commanded by a sous-lieutenant or a lieutenant but this too was subject to some variation, depending on the regiment. A senior non-commissioned officer, or a junior officer, would serve as a second in command known as a sous-officier adjoint (or SOA). The ideal norm expected to be established was to eventually use conscripts for all crew positions, although the reality of crewing the tanks always differed between the various regiments of the ABC.
As in any tank, the AMX-30B commander had to conduct engagements, maintain communication with the rest of the peloton and be responsible for his tank and the lives of his crew. The TOP-7 cupola gave the commander a panoramic view, and it incorporated a binocular M267 sight as well as ten M248 observation periscopes. With operations at night being accorded great importance, the commander would swap the binocular M267 sight for an infra-red OB23A sight. The TOP-7 could contra-rotate and the commander could line up the main armament on any target he observed. Asides from his cupola machine gun, after the introduction of the fully automatic 20mm CN20 F2 co-axial armament in the mid-1970s, the commander was expected to conduct any anti-aircraft engagements from his cupola due to its panoramic view. The main design purpose of this weapon on the AMX-30 series was as an anti-helicopter weapon system, but otherwise it was usually employed in the same manner as the 12.7mm co-axial weapon had been. With the ability to penetrate 15mm of armour at 1000 meters with armour piercing ammunition, or to fire high explosive rounds, it would have served admirably as a weapon against armoured personnel carriers or against infantry.


With the turret trained towards the camera we can see how this vehicle is not fitted with an ERA brick to the right of the CN F2 20mm co-axial cannon. There are slight variations in how the ERA bricks are fitted from tank to tank. [Pierre Delattre]

The AMX-30B’s entrance into service took place in spite of the original transmission’s obvious weakness and complexity, and the first armoured regiments equipping with the new tank addressed this by using experienced drivers. The 1e Régiment de Cuirassiers took a draft of fifty four engagés from Carpiagne as drivers in 1969 when the new AMX-30Bs arrived. Once the new tanks were in service the conscript drivers gradually took over. The AMX-30B was driven with two levers much like the wartime tanks, a step backwards from the relatively luxurious driving arrangements in the M47 Patton. The AMX-30B’s driver had the hard task of mastering manual gear changes, and the various drivers’ drills required to minimise wear on the transmission. The 5-SD-200D transmission incorporated five forward speeds and five reverse speeds and required close attention to the engine RPMs for gear changes. Driving the AMX-30B was still easier than the AMX-13, which had an even more demanding gear changing procedure to master. Once a driver had the feel for the gear changing process, the AMX-30B eventually endeared itself to most of its drivers.
 The training center at Carpiagne maintained a small fleet of driver training tanks without turrets, in order to ensure that conscript tank drivers could be provided with the best possible training for this task. These training tanks allowed the instructors to regularly change drivers throughout a training session. The CIABC also kept a fleet of regular AMX-30B gun tanks to train the drivers in maneuvering the tank with its long gun in confined spaces and to learn to steer the tank without banging the main armament into trees or buildings. Conscript and volunteer drivers alike were trained at Carpiagne.
With the requirement for night time operation and combat the driver was expected to master driving with the use of infra-red periscopes. The driver had to always be mindful of the turret position, and to engage his hydraulic traverse cut out switch when driving head out, because sudden traverse with the gun depressed could cause the driver serious injury. In combat the driver would have stood little chance in the event of a close range hit on the front of the hull resulting in penetration of the glacis plate, with half the tank’s main armament ammunition and some of the diesel fuel stored to his immediate right. The intention of the design was to maximise the use of the AMX-30’s high power to weight ratio to permit quick accelerations from position to position, which in essence became the driver’s main responsibility.

 The crew of this FORAD AMX-30B2 photographed at CENTAC in 2007 would have all been volunteers and included a female driver. The AMX-30 had by 2007 endured for just over four decades, encompassing a period during which much had changed in the Armée de Terre. [Pierre Delattre]

The driver and other crew members could also be expected to be trained for submerged river crossings. These began with specially constructed cisterns and graduated to actual crossings of large ponds and eventually river beds. The experience must have been best described as frightening in a tank with as many reliability problems as the early AMX-30B. The AMX-30B was built from the assembly line as a sealed unit, and preparing the tank for submerged crossings was a simple task included within the tank’s design parameters from the start. The Arme Blindée Cavalerie eventually developed a complete doctrine for submerged crossing by armoured regiments, with a well versed training organization to support every aspect of the submerged crossing process. A crossing was always assisted by engineer divers with a communications officer from the bank. The divers were known as Plongeurs d’Aide de Franchissement, or PAFs, and were tasked with identifying suitable fords and crossing points. PAF divers were elite troops drawn from the corps of engineers, who were often parachute qualified. To them fell the task of assisting stranded submerged vehicles and assuring their safe recovery. The PAF divers were trained to rescue crewmen from stranded vehicles. During a crossing, a PAF team floating above the crossing area in a zodiac provided a running commentary of the submerged tank’s progress, and submerged crossings were always supported by a recovery team to winch any breakdowns out immediately with an AMX-30D. The main risk during submerged crossings was always engine failure, which could happen if water was aspirated by the engine through any leaks in the various hatch seals that assured the impermeability of the engine compartment. The exhaust pipe covers were another point where water could easily find a way in, with consequent risk of drowning the engine.

Submersion towers of several heights fixed to the loader’s hatch were available for training. For combat use the narrow combat schnorkel was fixed to the loader’s periscope aperture, which permitted crossings in water as deep as four meters. In the early 1970s, AMX-30B-equipped armoured regiments in the Forces Francaises en Allemagne placed great importance on submerged crossing in the annual training schedule. Because river lines criss-crossed so much of the potential battlefield in central Europe, and enemy bridge demolition was assumed as a matter of course, submerged crossing offered a quicker means of river crossing than waiting for engineers to bridge rivers under fire. It was considered a critical task for at least a full peloton in each escadron to be proficient in submerged crossing in each régiment blindé, and the process always received due publicity within the army. Schnorkel operations for submerged river crossings were regularly practised right until the late 1990s.

The muzzle flash of the 105mm CN F1 at the moment of firing. [Jonathan Cany]

Submerged crossings, though a rite of passage for AMX-30 crews, were not the only means by which river crossings were addressed by the French Army. The post-war experience of fighting in the colonies and the importance of river crossing operations in 1944-45 had driven a thorough approach to solving river crossing problems and explains the weight given to submerged crossing capabilities in the AMX-30B specification. The Pont Gillois was a second such solution.
The Gillois mechanised ferries employed by the French Army’s Genie (Engineers) at divisional level were models of the type, and remained in service for many years. The army also deployed the bridgelaying AMX-13 Poseur de Pont, although the latter bore a bridge too lightly rated to carry an AMX-30 series vehicle, and a standard AMX-30 Poseur de Pont never entered service in any numbers. Some of the massive Gillois vehicles could be combined to carry three AMX-30B or AMX-30B2 gun tanks at the same time whilst crossing a major water course, and drivers had to master placing their tanks on these monsters carefully to not affect the Gillois’ trim in the water. Another task for the driver to master involved getting a battle tank onto the trailer of the large Berliet Porte Char (tank transporter) or onto the railway flats of the SNCF or Deutsche Bahn for transport to and from training areas. Both demanded skill and close communications with the logistics troops who conducted these operations on a daily basis in some instances. As in any tank, the AMX-30 driver had a heavy workload and good drivers were highly valued. Perhaps as recognition that his tank was a demanding vehicle to drive, in most regiments AMX-30B drivers were not expected to do night guard duty whilst on manoeuvres.

The Thales DIVT-16 CASTOR thermal gunnery camera, and the layout of the ERA bricks on the mantlet, the front slope of the turret roof and on the turret sides are visible. [Pierre Delattre]

The periodic mechanical problems common to the AMX-30B were taxing to the driver, and engine overheating and transmission failures were common, especially in the early part of the AMX-30B’s career. One of the critical drills the driver had to master quickly was the shut-down procedure, which took about fifteen minutes of idling the main fan revolutions per minute slowly downwards. An abrupt engine shutdown risked the cooling fan’s blades shattering with grievous consequences to the hydraulic hoses and oil lines in the engine compartment. Even in the later part of the 1970s the incidence of power pack changes could be frequent and the regiment’s AMX-30D recovery vehicles were at times hard pressed to keep up with breakdowns. When the tank was in good mechanical order the driver trained hard at charging from one fire position to the next on the training ground at the commander’s orders. French doctrine stressed high speed in the attack and to avoid enemy fire, but the AMX-30’s fire control system was designed to shoot at the halt. The AMX-30B was amongst the fastest and lightest vehicles of its type, and with its stiff suspension, it always meant a bumpy ride for the crews.
 The use of the M208 optical rangefinder and fire control system by the turret crew were practised and assessed at set times in the training year with the luxury of live firing on ranges with live ammunition being closely controlled for budgetary reasons. The gunner employed an M271 telescopic sight for daylight use and an infra-red OB17A sight for use in night operations. Each regiment was put through its paces in the annual autumn NATO manoeuvres, which was the climax of every training year in the Arme Blindé Cavalerie as it was in all other NATO armies. The AMX-30B’s turret was laid out ergonomically and a rapid rate of fire was possible, with roughly half the available 47 rounds of main armament ammunition in racks in the turret bustle. Up to three TRVP13A or TRVP213B wireless sets could be fitted, operated by the commander and loader, and incorporating the crew intercom system. A squadron or regimental command tank could be identified by three antennas on the turret roof, while a platoon command tank had two, and a standard battle tanks only carried a single antenna.

AMX-30B2 Greek Cypriot National Guard, Cyprus, Between 1990 and 1995, at least 50 AMX-30B2 tanks were sold to the Greek Cypriot National Guard by GIAT. The Cypriot AMX-30B2s carried at least two variations on the sand, green, and brown scheme, with thin white and black dividing stripes sometimes applied as seen here. The vehicles included mid production AMX-30B2 conversions with DIVT-13 Low Light Television gunnery cameras and later DIVT-16-equipped conversions. Markings included the Hellenic cross on the plated over rangefinder ports, and regimental emblems carried on the hull rear above the vehicle serials. Stowage was to French practice. [Painted by Sławomir Zajączkowski]


Read more…


  • Recommended - Armour

Renault FT & M1917 Light Tanks
Renault FT & M1917 Light Tanks During its 25-year service, the Renault FT tank was used in many...
Operational History of the Hungarian Armoured Troops in World War II
Operational History of the Hungarian Armoured Troops in World War II In 1938, concurrently with German territorial demands, Hungary...
The Leopard 1 And Leopard 2
The Leopard 1 And Leopard 2 This is a brief discussion of the iconic Leopard 1 and Leopard...